Serveur d'exploration sur le suicide chez les dentistes

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?

Identifieur interne : 000217 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000216; suivant : 000218

How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?

Auteurs : Alexander Holden

Source :

RBID : pubmed:24839710

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

UNLABELLED

All too often, those patients who complain are thought to be unreasonable. Healthcare professionals often feel that patients do not have an understanding of the pressures and hardships that they struggle with on a day-to-day basis. When a patient complains, it is seen by the professional complained about as a wholly negative event, leading to loss of confidence and leaving that professional feeling demoralized. Often complaints are due to a breakdown in communication. Sometimes a patient is unhappy with a treatment charge or simply there is a perception that he/she has been poorly treated. The General Dental Council and Primary Care Trusts (and now their successors) take a dim view of dental practitioners who deal with complaints poorly. This article sets out to offer a different perspective on complaints, so that the complaint system can be used to build trust between dental professionals and patients, instead of instilling demoralization and fear of litigation into those on the receiving end of a complaint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This article is relevant to all dental professionals as complaints are an inevitability of practice.


DOI: 10.12968/denu.2014.41.3.227
PubMed: 24839710


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Holden, Alexander" sort="Holden, Alexander" uniqKey="Holden A" first="Alexander" last="Holden">Alexander Holden</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:24839710</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24839710</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.12968/denu.2014.41.3.227</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000206</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000206</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000206</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000206</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000206</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Holden, Alexander" sort="Holden, Alexander" uniqKey="Holden A" first="Alexander" last="Holden">Alexander Holden</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Dental update</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0305-5000</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014" type="published">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel (MeSH)</term>
<term>Communication (MeSH)</term>
<term>Conflict, Psychological (MeSH)</term>
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations (ethics)</term>
<term>Dentists (psychology)</term>
<term>Dissent and Disputes (MeSH)</term>
<term>Ethics, Dental (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humans (MeSH)</term>
<term>Personhood (MeSH)</term>
<term>Self Concept (MeSH)</term>
<term>Trust (MeSH)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant (MeSH)</term>
<term>Communication (MeSH)</term>
<term>Concept du soi (MeSH)</term>
<term>Confiance (MeSH)</term>
<term>Dentistes (psychologie)</term>
<term>Déontologie dentaire (MeSH)</term>
<term>Désaccords et litiges (MeSH)</term>
<term>Humains (MeSH)</term>
<term>Personne humaine (MeSH)</term>
<term>Relations dentiste-patient (éthique)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="ethics" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dentist-Patient Relations</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychologie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Dentistes</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Dentists</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="éthique" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Relations dentiste-patient</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Attitude of Health Personnel</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Conflict, Psychological</term>
<term>Dissent and Disputes</term>
<term>Ethics, Dental</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Personhood</term>
<term>Self Concept</term>
<term>Trust</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Attitude du personnel soignant</term>
<term>Communication</term>
<term>Concept du soi</term>
<term>Confiance</term>
<term>Déontologie dentaire</term>
<term>Désaccords et litiges</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Personne humaine</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>UNLABELLED</b>
</p>
<p>All too often, those patients who complain are thought to be unreasonable. Healthcare professionals often feel that patients do not have an understanding of the pressures and hardships that they struggle with on a day-to-day basis. When a patient complains, it is seen by the professional complained about as a wholly negative event, leading to loss of confidence and leaving that professional feeling demoralized. Often complaints are due to a breakdown in communication. Sometimes a patient is unhappy with a treatment charge or simply there is a perception that he/she has been poorly treated. The General Dental Council and Primary Care Trusts (and now their successors) take a dim view of dental practitioners who deal with complaints poorly. This article sets out to offer a different perspective on complaints, so that the complaint system can be used to build trust between dental professionals and patients, instead of instilling demoralization and fear of litigation into those on the receiving end of a complaint.</p>
</div>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>
<b>CLINICAL RELEVANCE</b>
</p>
<p>This article is relevant to all dental professionals as complaints are an inevitability of practice.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed>
<MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM">
<PMID Version="1">24839710</PMID>
<DateCompleted>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>05</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised>
<Year>2019</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>10</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print">
<Journal>
<ISSN IssnType="Print">0305-5000</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
<Volume>41</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate>
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>Apr</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Dental update</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Dent Update</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination>
<MedlinePgn>227-8</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract>
<AbstractText Label="UNLABELLED">All too often, those patients who complain are thought to be unreasonable. Healthcare professionals often feel that patients do not have an understanding of the pressures and hardships that they struggle with on a day-to-day basis. When a patient complains, it is seen by the professional complained about as a wholly negative event, leading to loss of confidence and leaving that professional feeling demoralized. Often complaints are due to a breakdown in communication. Sometimes a patient is unhappy with a treatment charge or simply there is a perception that he/she has been poorly treated. The General Dental Council and Primary Care Trusts (and now their successors) take a dim view of dental practitioners who deal with complaints poorly. This article sets out to offer a different perspective on complaints, so that the complaint system can be used to build trust between dental professionals and patients, instead of instilling demoralization and fear of litigation into those on the receiving end of a complaint.</AbstractText>
<AbstractText Label="CLINICAL RELEVANCE" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">This article is relevant to all dental professionals as complaints are an inevitability of practice.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
<Author ValidYN="Y">
<LastName>Holden</LastName>
<ForeName>Alexander</ForeName>
<Initials>A</Initials>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList>
<PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo>
<Country>England</Country>
<MedlineTA>Dent Update</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>7805969</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0305-5000</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D001291" MajorTopicYN="N">Attitude of Health Personnel</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003142" MajorTopicYN="N">Communication</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003220" MajorTopicYN="N">Conflict, Psychological</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003812" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentist-Patient Relations</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000941" MajorTopicYN="Y">ethics</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D003815" MajorTopicYN="N">Dentists</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000523" MajorTopicYN="N">psychology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D034462" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dissent and Disputes</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D004990" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ethics, Dental</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D028723" MajorTopicYN="N">Personhood</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D012649" MajorTopicYN="N">Self Concept</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading>
<DescriptorName UI="D035502" MajorTopicYN="N">Trust</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData>
<History>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>5</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
<Year>2014</Year>
<Month>6</Month>
<Day>6</Day>
<Hour>6</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList>
<ArticleId IdType="pubmed">24839710</ArticleId>
<ArticleId IdType="doi">10.12968/denu.2014.41.3.227</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Holden, Alexander" sort="Holden, Alexander" uniqKey="Holden A" first="Alexander" last="Holden">Alexander Holden</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/SuicidDentistV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000217 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000217 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Sante
   |area=    SuicidDentistV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Exploration
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:24839710
   |texte=   How we view complainants; an ethical dilemma?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24839710" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a SuicidDentistV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.39.
Data generation: Sun Oct 3 17:04:29 2021. Site generation: Sun Oct 3 17:05:17 2021